Thinking-Drinking
  • Blog
  • Erin
  • Index
  • Articles
  • News
  • Podcast
  • Contact

Beer Taxonomy. Part 2 of 5- Base Grains and Mash Additions

1/16/2012

3 Comments

 
Beer taxonomy could use a revamp; several ideas have been put forth, but none have really caught on or made a big dent in the beer world, especially on the consumer side of things. This series of entries about beer taxonomy deconstructs the issues with beer taxonomy, and the last post in the series proposes a new paradigm. 

Part 1 of 5- Deconstructing "Lager" and "Ale"

This is Part 2 of 5- Base Grains and Mash Additions

It's baffling to me how, in an age when people are increasingly obsessed with what ingredients are in their food, the ingredients in beer are of little interest to most consumers. These ingredients, and the quality of them, not only inform the taste of the beer and therefore the experience of the drinker, but they also are an important historical marker-- the grains & additions used can be traced back through the millenia, and their domestication signaled the transition from nomadic society to agricultural society. Stocks of cereal grains and beer making cakes empowered early civilizations, nourished our distant ancestors and provided them with a safe conduit for imbibing water, prevented famine, sparked wars, inspired early philosophy and paleolithic art, and informed on a very basic level the structure of what one might call the current definition of a city. After examining the evidence, it is quite clear to me that: we are here because of beer. Given beer's immense historic significance it is astounding how the building blocks of this beverage have been forgotten by most beer drinkers. 


Base grains
Barley is so ubiquitous it is often assumed by most smaller brewers as the main ingredient.  Because smaller brewers assume that barley is the common-knowledge beer ingredient they often do not list it on the label, and list the ingredients only when what are known (by the BJCP) as "unusual adjuncts" such as rye, oats, etc. are added.  This tendency to assume market knowledge that may or may not be inherent has allowed large macrobrewers to produce many liquid tons of beer made from a large percentage of rice, not list the ingredients, and rest assured that the majority of the beer drinking public will assume that it is barley because no ingredient is listed.  Possibly in part because smaller brewers assume higher public knowledge and therefore do not always list ingredients and larger brewers followed suit an even worse circumstance has set in: a large portion of the beer drinking public neither knows nor cares what the ingredients are. 

Consider this loose analogy to the wine world: 

As diplomatic ties between France and England disintegrated in the late 1600s French wine sales dropped in England and wines from Portugual greatly increased; this was incentive enough for many English businessmen to relocate to the Douro.  The sudden popularity in port in England attracted some fraudulent producers (or perhaps it brought into the spotlight a more common practice that happened behind closed doors?). Some winemakers added elderberry juice to the must to help increase alcohol and color extraction.  Some producers added spices to the wine as well. The news broke in England, sales of port wine decreased, and the English government reacted with strict regulations and goal set forth by the Douro Wine Company to rip out all elderberry plants in the region. 

Imagine the beer drinking world discovering that what they assumed was barley beer is actually made of mostly rice (analogous to elderberry juice in port).  Would the average beer drinker care?  Perhaps they would if it were industry standard to label the source grains on the label. 

Mash Additions
Mash additions are usually announced as a selling point ("pumpkin beer," "apricot beer," "hopped").  Additions are considered a special twist that makes the beer unique, and as such will make people want to buy and drink it.  I believe this is a good thing-- but it is odd that the base grain isn't advertised as energetically as the mash additions. 

3 Comments
Thomas
2/23/2012 07:38:20 am

I can't wait to read your review of Bud Light Platinum in your next beer post.

Reply
Erin Scala
2/29/2012 03:20:29 pm

hehe

Reply
australia rsa certificate link
9/16/2012 09:00:05 pm

I thank you for sharing this very nice information. I always want and love reading quality contents. Keep sharing. Best wishes for your further efforts.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    _

    Follow @ErinBScala
    Instagram

    Erin

    I’m Erin, and this is my wine blog. Here, you'll find information about wines from around the world, and Virginia.  


    Top Posts

    Elizabeth Bird
    Sommelier History
    Stars & Terroir
    Dry German Wine
    1962 NYC Wine List

      Want to subscribe?

    Submit

    Archives

    December 2021
    May 2021
    June 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    January 2016
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011

    RSS Feed

    Picture